Open/Closed
is a collaborative exhibition of works by Lincoln Austin, Arryn
Snowball and Sean Phillips, co-curated by Megan Williams and
exhibiting at QUT Art Museum. Each
artist is a local contemporary powerhouse with affiliations and
representation from either Heiser Gallery, Rex Irwin, BMG Art and
Andrew Baker. The three have a certain “shared sensibility” and
it's uncanny how much so. But is it the right place to hold
the exhibition? Does the museum's rectilinear similarity to the art make room for
the art to have its own voice?
There is a somewhat outdated 'Modernist' feel of the exhibition, and it maybe due to the pairing of geometric art with geometric architecture. The labeling of 'modernist' is also based on my understanding of context and how much of art after Modernism is guided by it. The works in this exhibition have an unmistakable shortcoming of context as can be expected from works that have an abstract quality. They contain the typical cues of abstraction. Sean Phillips uses the arbitrary nature of words or letters and take them back to their origin; typography, as can be seen his series “Untitled 1-7” typewriter on paper. The edges of each letter are conjoined by land the overall shape of the sentences combined form a monolithic vertical line.
Lincoln Austin No end in sight 2011 |
In Lincoln Austin's geometric work, there are repeated shapes, economics of space, and forms that don't relate to the politics of the day, as abstract art should be. However, Austin's lack of context is compensated by his use of geometry to vibrate our sense of seeing. In other words, Austin aims to include the viewer which is generally a post-modern phenomenon in art-production reminiscent of the Optical art of Brigitte Riley.
In
September 19, 2012, the co-curator of QUT Art Museum, Megan Williams
conducted a tour of Open/Closed. She highlighted a curatorial trend
of “respecting the artwork” through the distancing between
label/title and the art. This is particularly evident when
considering the titles for Sean Phillips' pieces (with exception to
“Untitled 1-7”)
aren’t actually next to or on the same wall as the work. Megan
mentioned having to decide between map-based titling or traditional
titling (somewhat) next to the works.
She was right in choosing the latter, the former tends to confuse the viewer, who’s instinctive need for convenience is disrupted by having to decipher where they are in the map. However, a few unlucky viewers may have to decipher a white empty wall with a title.
Sean Phillips Open Closed 2011 |
Sean Phillips Untitled 1-7 2012 |
With
this in mind, any attempts or claims by the curator of having a
contemporary curatorial edge is merely a humble way of establishing
or asserting the museum’s place in the local art milieu
and market. One need only look underneath the titles of the works to
see where one may be able to buy the particular work; for Sean
Phillips, see Andrew Baker Art Dealership. It’s worth noting that
prior to Open/Closed, QUT Art Museum’s recent acquisitions included
a Lincoln Austin wire-mesh piece and the rationale of promoting new
works by an artist whose work they have invested in is questionable.
The
day that art is not hung as precious artifacts and the viewer can run their hands on the surface of a painting or
sculpture (in good faith) without fear of being reprimanded, or when conceptual value trumps market value, will be the day
QUT Art Museum and the works they choose to show, be considered
contemporary. They may even have to consider dropping ‘Museum’ in
their name, which brings to mind something Theodor Adorno once said
and for the reader to consider, “museum
and mausoleum are connected by more than phonetic association".